Uncategorized

Criminal Justice Bills Move Forward From PA House Committee

Some Republican members had concerns that imprecise language could have unintended consequences.

By Whitney Downard | Pennsylvania Capital-Star

The Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg. File photo.

As the Capitol building buzzed with news of a long-awaited budget deal on Wednesday, two dozen House lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee debated the wording of bills on post-conviction relief for certain veterans and restitution for juvenile offenders.

Several measures on the lengthy agenda passed unanimously, but some Republicans had concerns that imprecise language could have unintended consequences. 

โ€œMany of these are just not ready for prime time today,โ€ summarized Franklinโ€™s Rep. Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), the minority committee chair. 

House Bill 458, sponsored by Rep. Carol Hill-Evans (D-York), sought to expand an existing allowance made for veterans in the criminal justice systems with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injuries. 

State law allows veterans to submit either diagnosis as a mitigating factor during sentencing, but not as part of a post-conviction review โ€” leaving out those who are diagnosed while incarcerated. 

โ€œThese are men and women who served our country honorably, and itโ€™s not uncommon for their trauma to go unrecognized or untreated for months or even years,โ€ said Hill-Evans. 

โ€œThose invisible wounds of war may have contributed to the circumstances that led to their incarceration. Justice demands that we take that into account,โ€ she added.

December memo accompanying the bill notes that any veteran diagnosed prior to 1980, when PTSD was first recognized as a mental illness, couldnโ€™t use their diagnosis as a factor during their sentencing. 

โ€œThis bill does not guarantee anyone a reduced sentence; it simply gives the courts the opportunity to review the full picture,โ€ said Hill-Evans. 

But Republicans questioned whether its wording might cover other mental health disorders.  

โ€œI am concerned that the broad nature of this bill technically allows for the defense of just mental distress or disability,โ€ said Rep. Timothy Bonner (R-Mercer). โ€œI would support the bill if it were limited.โ€ 

Three of the 12 GOP committee members joined the 14 Democrats in support of the proposal. It passed on a 17-9 vote.

The panel unanimously approved House Bill 866, sponsored by Rep. Joe Webster (D-Montgomery), that would require the state Department of Corrections to provide briefings to veterans about whether their veteran benefits might be restored upon release.

Restitution and the juvenile justice system

A bill seeking to eliminate most fines and fees for juvenile offenders also encountered pushback.

House Bill 1385 sponsor Rep. Emily Kinkead (D-Allegheny)  said such costs kept low-income young people in the justice system longer than their wealthier peers. She said the proposal came at the recommendation of the stateโ€™s 2021 Juvenile Justice Task Force. 

โ€œThese are intended for adult offenders and not really contemplating the ability of a juvenile to be able to pay them,โ€ said Kinkead. โ€œIn many instances, these kids arenโ€™t actually even able to get jobs.โ€

Originally, the measure addressed several topics, but a committee amendment stripped that all away โ€” leaving only the portion addressing fees and fines. 

Kauffman questioned the use of the phrase โ€œactual victimโ€ in the bill, an undefined term. Kinkead said she believed that phrase was โ€œa reflection of the billโ€™s intent to only have restitution imposed in cases where an individual suffers actual material loss.โ€ 

โ€œThe idea that (actual victim) was included in the bill makes my skin crawl,โ€ said Kauffman. โ€œA victim is a victim.โ€

Kauffman also shared a concern that eliminating such costs โ€œprioritizes the offender over the victimโ€ and shifts the focus away from compensating crime victims. 

โ€œOnce again, I think this one is not ready for prime time, but needs some additional work,โ€ he noted. 

The bill moved on a 14-12 vote along partisan lines.

Pennsylvania Capital-Star is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Pennsylvania Capital-Star maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Tim Lambert for questions: info@penncapital-star.com.


Advertisement

Meet Your Canna Coach: Personalized Guidance, Free for You!

Canna Remedies: Your Go-To Accessible and Convenient Dispensary

Shop Now: cannaremediesnj.com/shop


About the author

Pennsylvania Capital-Star

The Pennsylvania Capital-Star is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news site dedicated to honest and aggressive coverage of state government, politics and policy.

Leave a Comment